Showing posts with label FCC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FCC. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

Process for stripping and a fluid catalytic cracking apparatus relating thereto (UOP)



Type
Patent
Inventor
Brian W. Hedrick
Inventor
Paolo Palmas
URL
Assignee
Uop Llc
Patent Number
US20140213428 A1
Issue Date
Jul 31, 2014
Abstract
One exemplary embodiment can be a process for stripping. The process can include passing catalyst to a stripping vessel containing a riser, providing a plurality of baffles having a first baffle and a second baffle, and providing one or more packing layers. The stripping vessel and riser may define an annular zone including annular area for stripping of the catalyst, and the first and second baffles collectively overlap in no more than about 50% of the annular area. Often, the first baffle is coupled to an outer circumference of the riser and extends outward, and the second baffle is coupled to an inner circumference of the stripping vessel and extends inward. Typically, the one or more packing layers are within the annular zone.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION This invention generally relates to a process for stripping in, e.g., a fluid catalytic cracking apparatus. DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART Fluid catalytic cracking (which may be abbreviated as “FCC” herein) can be a catalytic conversion process for cracking heavy hydrocarbons into lighter hydrocarbons by bringing the heavy hydrocarbons into contact with a catalyst composed of finely divided particulate material in a fluidized reaction zone. Most FCC units use a zeolite-containing catalyst having high activity and selectivity. As the cracking reaction proceeds, substantial amounts of highly carbonaceous material, referred to as coke, may be deposited on the catalyst forming spent catalyst. Generally, a high temperature regeneration burns the coke from the spent catalyst. The regenerated catalyst may be cooled before being returned to the reaction zone. Typically, spent catalyst is continually removed from the reaction zone and replaced by essentially coke-free catalyst from the regeneration zone. Often, the basic components of the FCC process include a riser, a reaction vessel, and a regenerator. In the riser, a distributor may inject a hydrocarbon feed that can contact the catalyst and be cracked into lighter hydrocarbons. A lift gas may be used to accelerate catalyst in a lower section of the riser below or during introduction of the feed. The lift velocity can refer to the velocity of the gas and the lifted catalyst just before feed distribution into the riser. Catalyst and hydrocarbon feed may be transported upward in the riser by the expansion of the gases that may result from the vaporization of the hydrocarbons. Often, coke accumulates on the catalyst particles as a result of the cracking reaction. The reaction vessel may disengage spent catalyst from product vapors. A catalyst stripper can remove adsorbed hydrocarbons from the surface of the catalyst. Generally, the regenerator burns the coke from the catalyst and recycles the regenerated catalyst into the riser. Generally, many catalyst strippers include a support grid and steam distribution system that restricts the catalyst flow causing a conflict in flow patterns between the upward flowing steam and downward flowing catalyst. Such flow restricted areas can tend to accumulate gas that may coalesce into large bubbles further restricting the flow of gas and catalyst. Often, the current support grid occupies up to 40% of the cross-sectional area and the distribution grid occupies up to 60% of the cross-sectional area. Moreover, trays within the stripping vessel can overlap permitting mostly micro-distribution of fluid. Thus, it would be desirable to minimize the support grid and system cross-sectional area to not unduly restrict flow.

Wednesday, March 4, 2015

Process for fluid catalytic cracking oligomerate (UOP)



Type
Patent
Inventor
Christopher P. Nicholas
Inventor
Christian D. Freet
URL
Assignee
Uop Llc
Patent Number
US20140135557 A1
Issue Date
May 15, 2014
Abstract
Distillate cracks to propylene more readily than VGO. Additionally, less branched hydrocarbons crack to propylene more readily than more branched hydrocarbons. Oligomerization to diesel range oligomers followed by catalytic cracking with less branched oligomers can provide more propylene.
BACKGROUND When oligomerizing light olefins within a refinery, there is frequently a desire to have the flexibility to make high octane gasoline, high cetane diesel, or combination of both. However, catalysts that make high octane gasoline typically make product that is highly branched and within the gasoline boiling point range. This product is very undesirable for diesel. In addition, catalysts that make high cetane diesel typically make product that is more linear and in the distillate boiling point range. This results in less and poorer quality gasoline due to the more linear nature of the product which has a lower octane value. The oligomerization of butenes is often associated with a desire to make a high yield of high quality gasoline product. There is typically a limit as to what can be achieved when oligomerizing butenes. When oligomerizing butenes, dimerization is desired to obtain gasoline range material. However, trimerization and higher oligomerization can occur which can produce material heavier than gasoline such as diesel. Efforts to produce diesel by oligomerization have failed to provide high yields except through multiple passes. When oligomerizing olefins from a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit, there is often the desire to maintain a liquid phase within the oligomerization reactors. A liquid phase helps with catalyst stability by acting as a solvent to wash the catalyst of heavier species produced. In addition, the liquid phase provides a higher concentration of olefins to the catalyst surface to achieve a higher catalyst activity. Typically, this liquid phase in the reactor is maintained by hydrogenating some of the heavy olefinic product and recycling this paraffinic product to the reactor inlet. To maximize propylene produced by the FCC unit, refiners may contemplate oligomerizing FCC olefins to make heavier oligomers and recycling heavier oligomers to the FCC unit. However, some heavy oligomers may be resistant to cracking down to propylene. The products of olefin oligomerization are usually mixtures of, for example, olefin dimers, trimers, and higher oligomers. Further, each olefin oligomer is itself usually a mixture of isomers, both skeletal and in double bond location. Highly branched isomers are less reactive than linear or lightly branched materials in many of the downstream reactions for which oligomers are used as feedstocks. This is also true of isomers in which access to the double bond is sterically hindered. Olefin types of the oligomers can be denominated according to the degree of substitution of the double bond, as follows: TABLE 1 Olefin Type Structure Description I R—HC═CH2 Monosubstituted II R—HC═CH—R Disubstituted III RRC═CH2 Disubstituted IV RRC═CHR Trisubstituted V RRC═CRR Tetrasubstituted wherein R represents an alkyl group, each R being the same or different. Type I compounds are sometimes described as α- or vinyl olefins and Type III as vinylidene olefins. Type IV is sometimes subdivided to provide a Type IVA, in which access to the double bond is less hindered, and Type IVB where it is more hindered.