Comparison of MPC and PI Controller Performance in Preflash and Pipestill Column System

CATEGORY: ENERGY CONSERVATION
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Process Systems Engineering (PSE ASIA)
25 - 27 June 2013, Kuala Lumpur.
Comparison of MPC and PI Controller Performance in Preflash and Pipestill Column System
Renanto Handogo (a) and Indra Lesmana (a)
renanto@chem-eng.its.ac.id
a Department of Chemical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
ABSTRACT
Preflash and Pipestill Column are two main units of petroleum processing industry which are interconnected each other. Recently the main unit used by this industry is Crude Oil Refinery Unit. As time goes by, the use of preflash and pipestill column becomes more popular because of its ability to reduce energy cost. The operation guidelines for these units always aim to safety and certain product flowrate and quality. In this work, assumptions are made where, process variables always change as the process goes. Model Predictive Control was used because it had better response compared to that of a conventional controller.
The steady state and dynamic simulation was conducted using Aspen DynamicTM, and MatlabTM .A ± 15% feed flowrate disturbances and ± 25% OIL-1 mass fraction disturbances were applied to the process. The dynamic performance of the controllers was compared between MPC and conventional controller using Integral of The Absolute Value of The Error/Set Point (IAE/Set Point), as a criteria how good the performance of the controller was. The result showed that the dynamic performance of MPC controller were more superior than that of conventional controller.
Introduction
After the energy crisis in 1970s the revamping of plant becomes very interesting since it can improve energy recovery and lowering operation cost. The typical case for revamping plant is revamping of an oil refinery plant. Following the revamping of plant, many efforts in optimizing energy within preflash and pipestill system were done Control configuration and control method using conventional controller was reported. Modifying the product composition controller using the temperature at the second stage as a manipulated variable only made small difference in the product composition control performance. Conventional controller showed a good performance when the prelash and pipestill system were given ±1% feed mass flowrate disturbances. There was a small offset in LCT quality, when disturbance is given. When the system was given ±2% disturbances, it exposed unstability (Handogo et al, 2010). Pipestill control using conventional controller was declared to have a good performance (Seborg, 2004), however people still demanding better controller performance. Since the first generation of MPC system were develop in 1970s the use of MPC become very popular. In the survey (Qin et al, 2003) more than 4600 application of MPC around the world at the end of 1999 were reported. This amount is twice as the result of five years before. This survey also reported that the majority of the user of MPC were from oil refineries and petrochemical plants.
GPC (Generalized Predictive Control) which is an adaptive MPC has developed. GPC was considered have a better performance compared to the adaptive controller using conventional controller. The comparison of QDMC and conventional controller to control pipestill was studied, QDMC is a new generation of MPC. It was reported that QDMC have a better performance. Furthermore QDMC was more easy to be applied in the plant compared to the conventional PI controller.
Aspen Plus has been widely applied in industrial and academic process simulation and design. It is also supported by regularly updated data from the US National Institute of Standards and Technology which provide the access to the best available experimental property data. In addition Aspen Tech have accumulated sufficient market and and size of sales to support an infrastructure for the continuous development and marketing. However, a control method which can handle feed composition disturbance and the usage of MPC in the preflash and pipestill system have not been studied yet. In this work MPC and conventional controller is used and compared to give a new sight about a control method which can control the feed composition disturbance and give a suggestion whether to use MPC or conventional controller.
Decoupling control was not used as the time constant of the processes differ significantly and imperfect model can not improve the performance of the system.
Free Full Text Source: http://sps.utm.my/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/PSEAsia2013-75.pdf  

Design of a Petroleum Preflash Column

CATEGORY: PREFLASH COLUMN
Energy Fuels, 2012, 26 (2), pp 1268–1274
Design of a Petroleum Preflash Column
William L. Luyben*
wll0@lehigh.edu
Department of Chemical Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, United States
Abstract
Crude oil contains saturated hydrocarbon chemical components with boiling points ranging from very low to very high. A small preflash column is frequently used upstream of the main pipestill to remove light ends and some of the naphtha to reduce the load on the pipestill furnace and column.
The major design optimization variables in the preflash column include pressure, reflux-drum temperature, and furnace coil outlet temperature. The paper explores the design of a typical preflash column.
Full Text Source (Subscription or Fee): http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ef201763g