Journal
of the American Chemical Society, 2012, 134, 7056−7065
Capture
of Carbon Dioxide from Air and Flue Gas in the Alkylamine-Appended
Metal−Organic Framework mmen-Mg2(dobpdc)
Thomas M. McDonald,† Woo Ram Lee,§ Jarad A. Mason,† Brian M. Wiers,†
Chang Seop Hong,*,§
and Jeffrey R. Long*,†
†Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720,
United States
§Department of Chemistry, Research Institute for Natural Sciences, Korea
University, Seoul 136-713, Republic of Korea
ABSTRACT:
Two
new metal−organic frameworks, M2(dobpdc) (M = Zn (1), Mg (2); dobpdc4− =
4,4′-dioxido-3,3′-biphenyldicarboxylate), adopting an expanded MOF-74 structure
type, were synthesized via solvothermal and microwave methods. Coordinatively
unsaturated Mg2+ cations lining the 18.4-Å-diameter channels of 2 were
functionalized with N,N′-dimethylethylenediamine (mmen) to afford Mg2(dobpdc)-
(mmen)1.6(H2O)0.4 (mmen-Mg2(dobpdc)). This compound displays an exceptional
capacity for CO2 adsorption at low pressures, taking up 2.0 mmol/g (8.1 wt %)
at 0.39 mbar and 25 °C, conditions relevant to removal of CO2 from air, and
3.14 mmol/g (12.1 wt %) at 0.15 bar and 40 °C, conditions relevant to CO2
capture from flue gas. Dynamic gas adsorption/desorption cycling experiments demonstrate
that mmen-Mg2(dobpdc) can be regenerated upon repeated exposures to simulated
air and flue gas mixtures, with cycling capacities of 1.05 mmol/g (4.4 wt %)
after 1 h of exposure to flowing 390 ppm CO2 in simulated air at 25 °C and 2.52
mmol/g (9.9 wt %) after 15 min of exposure to flowing 15% CO2 in N2 at 40 °C.
The purity of the CO2 removed from dry air and flue gas in these processes was
estimated to be 96% and 98%, respectively. As a flue gas adsorbent, the
regeneration energy was estimated through differential scanning calorimetry
experiments to be 2.34 MJ/kg CO2 adsorbed. Overall, the performance
characteristics of mmen-Mg2(dobpdc) indicate it to be an exceptional new
adsorbent for CO2 capture, comparing favorably with both amine-grafted silicas
and aqueous amine solutions.
INTRODUCTION
The concentration of CO2 in the Earth’s atmosphere is presently 390 ppm,1 an
increase of approximately 110 ppm since the start of the Industrial
Revolution.2 The combustion of fossil fuels is largely responsible for this
increase,3 yet fossil fuels will continue to be heavily utilized for energy
production during the 21st century. Currently, there is significant interest in
the development and implementation of technologies that slow CO2 emissions and
thus forestall the most severe consequences of global warming. For limiting
future CO2 emissions from large, stationary sources like coal-fired power
plants, carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) has been proposed.4 The CCS
process involves the selective removal of CO2 from gas mixtures, the
compression of pure CO2 to a supercritical fluid, transportation to an
injection site, and finally permanent subterranean or submarine storage.5 For
the retrofit of existing power plants, post-combustion CO2 capture is a likely configuration.
In this design, fuel is burned in air and CO2 is removed from the effluent. For
coal-fired power plants, the largest flue gas components by volume are N2
(70−75%), CO2 (15−16%), H2O (5−7%), and O2 (3−4%), with total pressures near 1
bar and temperatures between 40 and 60 °C.
Aqueous amine solutions are currently the most viable absorbents for carbon
capture under the aforementioned conditions, and they are presently used for
the removal of CO2 from industrial commodities like natural gas.7 While a
variety of advanced amines are available, 30% monoethanolamine (MEA) in water
is the benchmark solvent against which competing technologies are generally
compared. The low solvent cost and proven effectiveness make MEA an attractive
absorbent for many applications. However, if MEA were to be utilized for CCS,
electricity prices are projected to increase by 86%.8 The U.S. Department of
Energy has targeted a maximum 35% increase for the cost of electricity produced
from a coal power plant that captures 90% of the CO2 it generates. The
diversion of steam from the electricity generation cycle to the solvent
regeneration cycle sharply reduces the net electricity output of the plant,
drastically increasing electricity costs. Previous work has demonstrated that
plant efficiency is highly dependent on the solvent regeneration energy.
Presently, there is significant interest in the development of solid adsorbents
that selectively adsorb CO2 at partial pressures applicable to CCS.10 Solid
adsorbents are promising candidates because the significantly smaller heat
capacities of solids may reduce the sensible heat required for regeneration. In
addition, solvent loss and corrosion issues resulting from the use of aqueous
amines would be minimized if solids adsorbents were instead utilized.
Free Full Text Source: http://alchemy.cchem.berkeley.edu/jeff/paper155.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment